Nazarenes and the Oral
Law
By James Trimm
There has been a great deal of discussion in the movement today
over how
we as Nazarenes should view Jewish tradition, Oral Law and the
Talmud.
Now it is important to understand the first century world from
which
Nazarene Judaism emerged. There were three major sects of Judaism
at the
time: Pharisees, Sadducees and Essenes.
The first century writer Josephus writes of the Pharisees:
"...the Pharisees have delivered to the people a great many
observances by
succession from their fathers, which are not written in the law
of
Moses;..."
(Josephus; Ant. 13:11:6)
The Pharisees became what is known as Rabbinic Judaism and
eventually
wrote these traditions (known as "Oral Law") down in the Mishna and
later
the Talmud. The Mishna and Talmud are not the Oral Law, but they do
contain
the Oral Law as recorded by the Pharisees.
The core of the Talmud is the Mishna. The Mishna was complied
around 250
CE by Rabbi Y’hudah Ha Nasi from ealier oral and/or written
traditions.
It cites the opinions or Rabbis and teachers who lived in the
generation
immediately following Ezra and Nehemiah, up until the time of
its
composition. The Talmud was compiled around 500 CE and consists of
the
Mishna written in Hebrew and the commentary to the Mishna, known as
the
Gemara, surrounding it in Aramaic characters.
The Sadducees rejected these traditions, as Josephus continues:
"...for that reason it is that the Sadducees reject them, and say
that we
are to esteem those observances to be obligatory which are in the
written
word, but are not to observe what are delivered from the tradition
of our
forefathers..."
(ibid)
The Sadducees HAD to reject the Oral Law. They did not believe in a
resurrection or an afterlife. They had rejected the things that
Judaism has always held to. It was hard enough to make their views
compatible with the Written Torah, it was easier for them to simply
reject the Oral Torah out of hand. In fact they HAD to reject the
Oral Law if they wanted to reject any understanding of the written
Torah that included a resurrection and an afterlife!
Then there were the Essenes, these are they who are believed to
have
written the Dead Sea Scrolls. The Essenes did not reject the
concept of
Oral Law, as the Sadducees did, but they did have an ALTERNATE set
of such
traditions, many of which are recorded in the Dead Sea Scrolls.
Among the
Scrolls is a document called MMT ("Some of the Works of teh Torah).
In
this document the Essenes point out some of their differences with
the
Oral Law as recorded in the Mishna. For example in the Mishna
(Hullin
4:1-5) there is an Oral tradition forbidding the eating of the
fetus of a
slaughtered animal, while item 12 in MMT allows the eating of such
a
fetus. Many of the points addressed in MMT are addressed directly
at
points of Oral Torah found in the Mishna. Essenes did not reject
the Oral
Torah, they had their own understanding of it.
Now our Nazarene forefathers had roots in Pharisaic Judaism and in
Essene
Judaism but not in Sadduceean Judaism.
Yeshua's teachings often echoed those of the famous Pharisaic
teacher
Hillel. When Yeshu was still a child Hillel taught "Do not do to
others
what you would not have them do to you" while Yeshua grew up to
teach "do
onto others as you would have them do to you."
The Nazarenes also clearly had roots in Essene Judaism. There is
evidence
that Yochanan the immerser ("John the Baptist") came out of the
Qumran
community. Several of Yeshua's Talmidim (including Kefa) had first
been
talmidim of Yochanan. Both the Essenes and the Nazarenes called
themselves "The Way" and "Sons of Light".
The Esseneic and Pharisaic origins of Nazarene Judaism are
easily
documented and could fill volumes. I have reduced them here to a
short
paragraph each.
The written Torah is not complete in itself. Instead it presupposes
that the reader also has access to additional information. For
example the observance of Torah involves the use of the Hebrew
calendar. Nowhere does the written Torah tell us the inner workings
of this calendar, it presupposes that this information was also
passed down to us orally by our forefathers.
There are actually two types of “Oral Law” and they are very
different from one another.
The first is Oral Torah from Sinai. Moshe was on Mt. Sinai for
forty days. During this time her received much of the material that
we know as the Written Torah as recorded in the five books of
Moses. However if one to get the five books of Moses as a “books on
tape” edition, it would not take anywhere near forty days to listen
to them. It would not even take one day to listen to them. So is
this ALL the information Moses received on Mount Sinai? Why does
Leviticus 26:46 say that Moses received “Laws” (plural) on Mount
Sinai? Could he have received Torah She-Bi-Khatav (The Written
Torah) and Torah She-Al-Peh (The Oral Torah)?
As we stated earlier, there is not sufficient information in the
written Torah to allow it to be observed without some additional
information.
For example the written Torah says not to go out of ones “place” on
the Sabbath (Ex. 16:29) but just what does this mean? If the
Sabbath starts and I am in the latrine, must I stay there until it
is over? If I am in my home and the Sabbath starts, must I wait
until the Sabbath end to go out to the latrine? Does it mean I
cannot leave my house? my yard? my city? Surely the ancient Hebrews
(our forefathers) asked Moses what this commandment meant. Did
Moses shrug his shoulders and say “heck if I know”, or was this
part of the information he also received on Mount Sinai? If so then
our forefathers had this information. Is this what the Psalmist
means when he says:
1: Give ear, O my people, to my Torah: incline your ears to the
words of my mouth.
2: I will open my mouth in a parable: I will utter dark sayings of
old:
3: Which we have heard and known, and our fathers have told us.
4: We will not hide them from their children, showing to the
generation to come the praises of YHWH, and his strength, and his
wonderful works that he hath done.
(Ps. 78:1-4)
Another example can be found in Deut. 12:21 which tells us that if
we live to far from the Temple and need to slaughter an animal to
eat, YHWH says we may do so as long as we do it “as I [YHWH] have
commanded you”. But there are no instructions for the ritual
slaughter of an animal in the written Torah. This commandment of
the written Torah must be alluding to an oral companion to the
written Torah.
One can give many more examples. What does it mean not to “work” on
the Shabbat? what constitutes “work”? How does one “celebrate” the
Shabbat (Ex. 31:16)? What constitutes a “Bill of Divorcement”
(Deut. 24:1f) what is it supposed to say?
When Ezra read the Torah to the people in Nehemiah 8:1-8, he and
the Levites also “gave the sense, and caused them to understand the
reading” (8:7-8). They gave them an oral companion to the written
text:
1: And all the people gathered themselves together as one man into
the street that was before the water gate; and they spoke unto Ezra
the scribe to bring the Book of the Torah of Moses, which YHWH had
commanded to Israel.
2: And Ezra the priest brought the Torah before the congregation
both of men and women, and all that could hear with understanding,
upon the first day of the seventh month.
3: And he read therein before the street that was before the water
gate from the morning until midday, before the men and the women,
and those that could understand; and the ears of all the people
were attentive unto the Book of the Torah.
4: And Ezra the scribe stood upon a pulpit of wood, which they had
made for the purpose; and beside him stood Mattithiah, and Shema,
and Anaiah, and Urijah, and Hilkiah, and Maaseiah, on his right
hand; and on his left hand, Pedaiah, and Mishael, and Malchiah, and
Hashum, and Hashbadana, Zechariah, and Meshullam.
5: And Ezra opened the book in the sight of all the people; (for he
was above all the people;) and when he opened it, all the people
stood up:
6: And Ezra blessed YHWH, the great Elohim. And all the people
answered, Amen, Amen, with lifting up their hands: and they bowed
their heads, and worshipped YHWH with their faces to the
ground.
7: Also Jeshua, and Bani, and Sherebiah, Jamin, Akkub, Shabbethai,
Hodijah, Maaseiah, Kelita, Azariah, Jozabad, Hanan, Pelaiah, and
the Levites, caused the people to understand the Torah: and the
people stood in their place.
8: So they read in the Book in the Torah of Elohim distinctly, and
gave the sense, and caused them to understand the reading.
(Nehemiah 8:1-8)
When the old Worldwide Church of God began observing the biblical
festivals, one of the problems they ran into was how to celebrate
them. Only sketchy information is given in the written Torah on
many of these festivals (we will revisit this issue again later in
this article in relation to Yeshua’s observances of Sukkot and
Passover).
When it comes to answering these questions, we can turn to the
understandings our forefathers had of these things, which they
passed down to us orally, or we can make something up. Short of a
mutually accepted pipeline to Elohim, those are our only
choices.
Another form of Oral Law are the decrees from the Elders. The
Elders are said to have ha the “halachic authority”. Halachic
authority is the authority to make halachic determinations
interpreting the Torah forbidding and permitting activities based
on these interpretations (for example if a matter came up which was
not settled by the written Torah), and resolving matters between
fellow believers. The word "halacha" means "the way to walk." Torah
observance requires halachic authority for three reasons. First
there are matters about which the written Torah is ambiguous and
must be clarified. Secondly is the matter of conflicting Torah
commands. For example the Torah requires the priests to circumcise
on the eight day after a birth, but also requires rest from work on
the Sabbath. Which commandment holds priority? Finally the Torah
requires us to establish courts (Deut. 16:18).
In the Torah the Halachic authority was originally held by Moses
himself (Ex. 18:13) but later a council of Elders were appointed
(Ex. 18:13-26; Dt. 1:9-18) These Elders showed men "the way wherein
they must walk" (i.e. Halacha) (Ex. 18:20) Their judgments were
regarded as the judgment of Elohim himself (Dt. 1:17) and were even
called "Torah" (Dt. 17:11) At first these men had authority only in
small matters (Ex. 18:22, 26; Dt. 1:17) but later their authority
was expanded (Dt. 17:8). This council was later defined as seventy
Elders whom Elohim placed his Spirit upon (Num. 11:16-17;
24-25).
The decrees of these elders added to the body of what was known as
the “Oral Law” in much the same was as “legal precedence” does in
secular law today.
One classic example of a matter settled by a Decree of the Elders
was the issue of circumcision on the Sabbath. Circumcision is
commanded to be done on the eighth day (Gen. 17:11) yet on every
seventh day no work is allowed (Ex. 20:10). The Elders decreed that
the commandment to circumcise on the eighth day held priority over
the commandment to rest on the Sabbath (as recorded in the Mishna
m.Shabbat 18:3-19:2 and in the Talmud b.Shabbat 128a). Yeshua
alluded to and agreed with this Decree of the Elders when he
said:
If a man is circumcised on the day of the Sabbath
that the Torah of Moshe be not loosed,
do you murmur against me because
I have healed a whole man on the Sabbath day?
(Jn. 7:23)
Similarly we read in the Talmud:
Rabbi Eleazar answered and said: If circumcision
which attaches to one only of the two hundred and
forty eight members of the human body, suspends
the Sabbath, how much more shall [the saving of]
the whole body suspend the Sabbath!
b.Yoma 85b
Yeshua clearly advocated and recognized the authority of these
Elders when he said such things as “…whoever shall say to his
brother, RAKA, shall be liable to the Sanhedrin…” (Mt. 5:22) and
“The scribes and Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat…” (Mt. 23:1).
At the same time Yeshua also took issue with the Decrees of the
Elders when they conflicted with Scripture (Mt. 15; Mt. 23)
The Torah also allowed for the Halachic authority to be held by a
King (Dt. 17:8-12; 14-20). Eventually the Elders decided to
establish such a monarchy (1Sam. 8:1-7). The throne of these Kings
was sees as being "the throne of Elohim" (1Chron. 29:23) Their
Halachic authority became termed "the key of the House of David"
(Is. 22:21-22).
The Pharisees once held the Keys of the House of David. Mt. 23:13
is key to understanding Yeshua's attitude to the Halachic authority
of the Pharisees. Here Yeshua says:
But woe to you scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites!
For you shut up the Kingdom of Heaven against men;
for you neither go in,
nor do you allow those who are entering to go in.
A parallel passage appears in Lk. 11:52:
Woe to you scribes!
For you have taken away the key of knowledge.
you did not enter in yourselves,
and those who were entering in you hindered.
Now when we look at these two passages together it becomes clear
that
the "key" in Luke 11:52 had the potential to open up or shut up
the
Kingdom of Heaven. This "key" is clearly then "the key of the house
of
David" in Is. 22:22:
The key of the House of David I will lay on his shoulder;
so he shall open, and no one shall shut;
and he shall shut and no one shall open.
The Pharisees took away the key (authority) thus shutting up
the
Kingdom. They lost the authority, it was taken from them and given
to
Yeshua's Talmidim:
In Mt. 16:18-19 Yeshua says he would give "the keys of the Kingdom"
to
Kefa and his other talmidim:
And I also say to you that you are Kefa,
And upon this rock I will build my assembly,
and the gates of Sheol shall not prevail against it.
And I will give you the keys of the Kingdom of Heaven,
and whatever you bind on earth will be bound in Heaven
and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.
The Pharisees lost this authority because of hypocrisy. Yeshua
describes their hypocrisy in Mt. 23 as follows:
On Moshe's seat sit the scribes and P'rushim.
And all that he (Moshe) says to you observe and do.
But not according to their works,
for they say, but do not.
(Mt. 23:2-3)
Yeshua repeatedly charges the Pharisees with Hypocrisy (Mt. 6;
15:7
and Matt. 23 for examples). Yeshua often charged Pharisees with
"hypocrisy" even the Talmud itself makes the same association:
King Jannai said to his wife', `Fear not the Pharisees and the
non-Pharisees but the hypocrites who are the Pharisees; because
their
deeds are the deeds of Zimri but they expect a reward like
Phineas'
(b.Sotah 22b)
Job 13:16 says "a hypocrite shall not come before him."
Based on this verse the Talmud itself correctly lists Hypocrites as
one of
four classes who will not receive the presence of the
Shekhinah:
R. Hisda also said in the name of R. Jeremiah b. Abba: Four
classes
will not receive presence of the Shechinah, — the class of
scoffers,
the class of liars, the class of hypocrites, and the class of
slanderers. `The class of scoffers' — as it is written, He
withdrew
His hand from the scoffers.(Hosea 7:5) `The class of liars' — as it
is
written, He that telleth lies, shall not tarry in my sight.(Ps.
101:7)
`The class of hypocrites' — as it is written, For a hypocrite
shall
not come before him.(Job 13:16) `The class of slanderers — as it
is
written, For thou art not a God that hath pleasure in
wickedness:
neither shall evil dwell with thee,'(Ps. 5:5) [which means] Thou
art
righteous, and hence there will not be evil in thy abode.
(b.San. 103a)
We know from Numbers 11:16-17 that the Elders must have the Spirit
of Elohim upon them, but since hypocrites cannot receive the
presence of the Shekhinah, they cannot serve as valid Elders.
Job says: "the congregation of the hypocrites shall be desolate"
(Job. 15:34)
Thus Yeshua took the Keys from the Pharisees and gave these keys to
Kefa and his Talmidim:
This key is the halachic authority. Yeshua recognized that the
Pharisees held that halachic authority but he also tells us that
they had squandered it by rejecting the Kingdom offer (see article
"The Kingdom Offer") and refusing to use the key to help Messiah
open up the Messianic Kingdom.
The Messiah himself also had the Key of David (Rev. 3:7). In Mt.
16:18-19 Yeshua says he would give "the keys of the Kingdom" to
Kefa and his students:
And I also say to you that you are Kefa,
And upon this rock I will build my assembly,
and the gates of Sheol shall not prevail against it.
And I will give you the keys of the Kingdom of Heaven,
and whatever you bind on earth will be bound in Heaven
and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.
This passage is best understood when compared to Mt. 18:15-20 This
passage deals with the law of witnesses (Mt. 18:16 = Dt. 19:15) and
refers to an "assembly" (Mt. 18:17) which has the power to "bind"
and "loose" (Mt. 18:18) just as does Mt. 16:18-19. Since Mt. 18:16
quotes Dt. 19:15 it is clear that the "assembly" in Mt. 18:17 (and
also Mt. 16:18) is the "priests and judges who serve in those days"
in Dt. 19:17. This is also clear because this "assembly" has the
power to "bind" and "loose." These are two Semitic idioms used in
Rabbinic literature as technical terms referring to Halachic
authority. To "bind" means to "forbid" an activity and to "loose"
means to permit an activity (as in j.Ber. 5b; 6c; j.San. 28a; b.Ab.
Zar. 37a; b.Ned. 62a; b.Yeb. 106a; b.Bets. 2b; 22a; b.Ber. 35a;
b.Hag. 3b). Thus in Mt. 16:18-19 & 18:18 Yeshua gave his
students the Halachic authority which we see them using in Acts
15.
Today we as restored Nazarenes must also have our own unique
halachic authority apart from that of Rabbinic Judaism. As "sons of
light" we cannot be halachicly yoked with unbelievers. While we
cannot be halachicly yoked with unbelievers (Rabbinic Judaism) we
must "come out from among them and be separate" (2Cor. 6:14-18
& Is. 52:11) for we must ourselves establish courts (Dt.
16:18).
We cannot turn to the "wisdom" of the "Pharisaic Rabbinical" Rabbis
and sages of the last two thousand years and simply "accept all the
Rabbinical Halakhah, except where Mashiach and His Talmidim clearly
and definitely offer another position of Halakhah" for the Tenach
warns us:
How can you say, "We are wise, and the Torah of YHWH is with
us"?
Look, the false pen of the scribe certainly works falsehood.
The wise men are ashamed, they are dismayed and taken.
Behold they have rejected the Word of YHWH;
So what wisdom do they have?
(Jer. 8:8-9)
The unbelieving sages and Rabbis of "Pharisaic Rabbinical" Judaism
claim they "are wise" and that "the Torah of the LORD is with us."
But they have "rejected the Word of YHWH" (i.e. Yeshua the Messiah;
see Jn. 1:1, 14; Rev. 19:13) "So what wisdom do they have?"
There are preserved for us five fragments from an ancient Nazarene
Commentary on Isaiah in which the fourth century Nazarene writer
makes it clear that Nazarenes of the fourth century were not
"following Pharisaic Rabbinical Halakhah." The following is taken
from the Nazarene commentary on Isaiah 8:14:
"And he shall be for a sanctuary; but for a stone of stumbling and
for a rock of offence to both the houses of Israel¦"
The Nazarenes explain the two houses as the two houses of Shammai
and Hillel, from whom originated the Scribes and Pharisees… [they
Pharisees] scattered and defiled the precepts of the Torah by
traditions and mishna. And these two houses
did not accept the Savior
The Nazarene commentary on Isaiah 8:20-21 has:
The Scribes and the Pharisees tell you to listen to them
answer them like this:
"It is not strange if you follow your traditions since every
tribe
consults its own idols. We must not, therefore, consult your
dead [sages] about the living one."
So it is clear that the original Nazarenes were not "following
Pharisaic Rabbinical Halakhah."
Let us return to the subject of the Oral Law in general. Now in
Acts 23:6 Paul states “I am a Pharisee”. The Pharisees maintained a
belief in the traditions handed down by their forefathers. As
Josephus writes:
…the Pharisees have delivered to the people a great
many observances by succession from their fathers,
which are not written in the law of Moses; …
(Josephus; Ant. 13:10:6)
Concerning his Pharisee background Paul says:
And I advanced in Judaism beyond many of my
contemporaries in my own nation, being more
exceedingly zealous for the tradition of my fathers.
(Gal. 1:14)
Notice that in Acts 28:17 Paul insists:
I have done nothing against our people
or the customs of our fathers.
(Acts 28:17)
Paul writes to the Thessalonians concerning these “traditions”:
“Therefore, brothers stand fast and hold the traditions which you
have been taught…
withdraw yourselves from every brother that walks disorderly and
not after
the traditions which he received from us.”
(2Thes. 2:15; 3:6)
Paul even made use of these oral “traditions” in his writings. Paul
says "...they drank of that spiritual rock that followed them: and
that rock was Messiah." (1Cor. 10:4). The Torah records more than
one occasion when Moshe (Moses) brought forth water from
a rock (Ex. 16:4-35; 17:1-9; Num. 20:1-13; 16-20). According to
Rabbinic tradition the rock did in fact follow them. The Talmud
says that it was "a moveable well" (b.Shabbat 35a) and calls it
"the Well of Miriam" (b.Ta'anit 9a). Rashi comments on b.Ta'anit 9a
saying that the rock "rolled and went along with Israel, and it was
the rock Moshe struck." The tradition of the moving rock known as
the "Well of Miriam" is also found in B'midbar Parshat Chukkat.
Paul's statement that the rock "followed them" testifies to the
fact that he accepted this oral tradition as being factual.
The second century Nazarene writer Gish’fa (Heggissipus) made use
in his writings of these oral traditions. Eusebius writes of
him:
And he quotes some passages from The Gospel according to
the Hebrews and from ‘The Syriac’, and some particulars from
the Hebrew tongue, showing that he was … from the Hebrews,
and he mentions other matters as taken from the oral tradition
of the Jews.”
(Eccl. Hist. 4:22)
Yeshua himself seems to have also accepted the “traditions of our
fathers” which had been passed down orally.
In John 7:37-38 we read:
“And on the great day, which is the last of the feast, Yeshua stood
and cried out and said, If anyone thirsts, let him come to me and
drink. Whoever believes in me, as the Scriptures have said, rivers
of water of life will flow from his belly.”
The occasion is the last great day of Sukkot (Jn. 7:2) and the
setting appears to be the water libation ceremony at the Temple as
prescribed by the Oral Law. A priest had a flask of gold filled
with water and another has a flask of gold filled with wine. There
were two silver bowls perforated with holes like a narrow snout.
One was wide for the water the other is narrow for the wine. The
priests poured the wine and water into each of their bowls. The
wine and water mixed together. The wine flowing slowly through the
narrow snout and the water flowing quickly through the wider snout.
(m.Sukkot 4:9) Yeshua said that this ritual from the Oral Law was
actually prophetic and symbolic of himself!
In all four Gospels Yeshua participates in the Passover Sader. The
elements of the sader, such as the “cup of redemption”; dipping in
bitter herbs; and the afikomen (the last piece of unleavened bread
passed around and eaten at the end) all come from the Oral Law as
recorded in the Mishna (m.Pes. 10). Yeshua not only accepted and
kept these Oral Law rituals, but also spoke of them being prophetic
of himself.
There is an interesting story in the Talmud which makes a profound
point about the Oral Law:
Our Rabbis taught: A certain heathen once came before Shammai and
asked him, ‘How many Torahs have you?’ ‘Two,’ he replied: ‘the
Written Torah and the Oral Torah.’ ‘I believe you with respect to
the Written, but not with respect to the Oral Torah; make me a
proselyte on condition that you teach me the Written Torah [only].
[But] he scolded and repulsed him in anger. When he went before
Hillel, he accepted him as a proselyte. On the first day, he taught
him, Alef, beth, gimmel, daleth; the following day he reversed
[them ] to him. ‘But yesterday you did not teach them to me thus,’
he protested. ‘Must you then not rely upon me? Then rely upon me
with respect to the Oral [Torah] too.’
(b.Shabbat 31a)
The point of the story is that the same forefathers that passed the
written Torah down to us, also passed the Oral Torah down to us
with it. What logic is there in accepting the written Torah that
they delivered to us as truth, while rejecting the Oral Law passed
down by the very same forefathers?
Now we as Nazarenes do not believe that the Rabbis or
Pharisaic/Rabbinic
Judaism held the power to bind and loose after the first century,
perhaps
not even before the first century. Thus we should not simply accept
these
rulings, on the other hand we should not simply reject them out of
hand.
In may cases the Talmud or the related halachic Midrashim present
the line
of logic which led to the decisions being made. We should look at
these
lines of logic to determine if the decisions were valid and
sound.
For example I heard one Messianic Rabbi bashing the Talmud and
claiming
that the Rabbis had added thirty-nine rules to the simple
commandment not
to work on the Sabbath. In fact the thirty-nine categories (given
in
m.Shabbat 7:2) are drawn from the text of the Torah. In the Torah
the
instructions concerning the building of the Tabernacle are
interrupted by a
restatement of the commandment not to work on the Sabbath (Ex.
31:12-17).
The connection this section of Exodus has with the surrounding
material
seems to be the word “work” (Ex. 31:14) and “workmanship” (Ex.
31:3) (same
word in the Hebrew). Thus the commandment not to “work” on the
Sabbath
(Ex. 31:14) is restated as a reminder to abstain from the
“workmanship” of
the Tabernacle mentioned in Ex. 31:3. Thus the term “work” in
the
commandment not to work on the Sabbath may be elaborated and
defined by the
thirty-nine categories of “workmanship” involved in building
the
Tabernacle.
We as Nazarenes should not reject the material in the Talmud out of
hand,
we should seek to understand it. Then we should “eat the date and
spit
out the seeds”. The same approach should be taken to the Dead Sea
Scrolls.
Nazarenes should not be modern day Sadducees.
RETURN