Tags:
Permalink Reply by Margaret Frost on October 27, 2010 at 11:43pm
Permalink Reply by 命 on October 29, 2010 at 11:09am
Permalink Reply by Margaret Frost on October 30, 2010 at 5:22pm Can't say I think Papias is correct on this one...
Seems like he's adhering to what would later become standard Catholic denial of Mary's post-Yeshua motherhood.
Permalink Reply by J. Jury (אליהוא) on October 31, 2010 at 2:33pm The word translated in "greek" as "wife" can also mean "woman" as it does the same in the Hebrew. Thus, a question to ask is, are not all the daughters of a father accurately described as his women? when they refer to someone's wife, they also say "his woman". This indicates possession. He owns his wife; they belong to each other. The father also owns the daughters. So, yes, the woman could be both the woman of Cleopas and the daughter of the same Cleopas at the same time, without him being married to her, which would of course be contrary to Torah and morality in general. As to that fragment coming from Papias, I'll have to do research on it, for I did not know that there were any fragments of Papias that survived apart from quotations in the Church Fathers writings.
Permalink Reply by 命 on October 31, 2010 at 2:41pm
Christian said:Can't say I think Papias is correct on this one...
Seems like he's adhering to what would later become standard Catholic denial of Mary's post-Yeshua motherhood.
This Mary of Clopas, the other Mary at the cross, was married to Clopas. Clopas is one of the twin brothers of Joseph the carpenter.
Genealogies do get confusing, especially when same names are common within a family. So Mary of Clopus has nothing to do with whether or not Yeshua's mother gives birth to later children.
Permalink Reply by J. Jury (אליהוא) on October 31, 2010 at 8:17pm Jesse, you forget that Papias learned from the apostles themselves. So, when the Gospel says "Mary of Clopas" that can mean "wife" or "daughter" or "woman". of indicates ownership. Papias can know from clarification by speaking ot apostles how Mary was "of" Clopas. He simply discerned so in what way. Now, Hegessipus and Polycarp need not conflict, but rather, the people translating them misunderstood one or the other. Thus, originally, they both taught either "wife" or both "daughter". Later copyists did not know which was which in the context and the translators into greek rendered one for Hegessipus, and the other for Papias, when originally they had said the same thing.
Permalink Reply by Margaret Frost on November 1, 2010 at 12:10am
Permalink Reply by 命 on November 1, 2010 at 12:56am There are 2 apostles named James. One James is the son of Zebedee and Salome, the other James is the son of Clopas aka Alphaeus and Mary of Clopas. Both of these James, along with their brothers, are cousins to Yeshua. There is another James the brother of Jesus who is not one of the twelve, but leads the early assembly (James the Just)
Eusebius writes that after the martyrdom of James the Just, they take counsel as to who was worthy to succeed James...
"They all with one consent pronounced Symeon, the son of Clopas, of whom the Gospel also makes mention; to be worthy of the episcopal throne of that parish. He was a cousin, as they say, of the Saviour. For Hegesippus records that Clopas was a brother of Joseph. "
Yeshua's family and extended family was key in his ministry.
Yes, Papias said:
"James the bishop and apostle".
That's the James in question, who was actually Yeshua's brother.
Margaret Frost said:There are 2 apostles named James. One James is the son of Zebedee and Salome, the other James is the son of Clopas aka Alphaeus and Mary of Clopas. Both of these James, along with their brothers, are cousins to Yeshua. There is another James the brother of Jesus who is not one of the twelve, but leads the early assembly (James the Just)
Eusebius writes that after the martyrdom of James the Just, they take counsel as to who was worthy to succeed James...
"They all with one consent pronounced Symeon, the son of Clopas, of whom the Gospel also makes mention; to be worthy of the episcopal throne of that parish. He was a cousin, as they say, of the Saviour. For Hegesippus records that Clopas was a brother of Joseph. "
Yeshua's family and extended family was key in his ministry.
Permalink Reply by Margaret Frost on November 1, 2010 at 8:13pm Wait a minute, I thought James Trimm was second cousin of Yahushua twice removed. There are too many James' to remember... ;)
© 2013 Created by James Trimm.