Permalink Reply by 命 on May 3, 2010 at 2:46pm
Permalink Reply by Yaacov on May 3, 2010 at 3:33pm Obama will probably be the last president of the United States
Permalink Reply by 命 on May 3, 2010 at 3:36pm I'm hoping the United States lasts long enough for me to leave it (2021).
Permalink Reply by 命 on May 3, 2010 at 4:14pm I thought Andrew Jackson was...
Christian said:Obama will probably be the last president of the United States
Permalink Reply by Smart on May 3, 2010 at 9:58pm I'm hoping the United States lasts long enough for me to leave it (2021).
Permalink Reply by J. Jury (אליהוא) on May 3, 2010 at 10:19pm
Permalink Reply by J. Jury (אליהוא) on May 3, 2010 at 10:22pm Nah just move to California, we're going to secede from the Union.
i hate the united states
Anaiah Priel (Andrew P) Carlson said:I'm hoping the United States lasts long enough for me to leave it (2021).
Permalink Reply by J. Jury (אליהוא) on May 3, 2010 at 11:02pm i do not believe in democracy, thus I do not believe in America.
Permalink Reply by J. Jury (אליהוא) on May 3, 2010 at 11:33pm lol. I believe in government only taught in Scriptures. So, Judges and/or Monarchy. As far as I'm aware, judges are not elected by the people.
In a democracy, the foundational rules can be overthrown. This is inexcuseable. And, i just think it works much more efficient when you don't involve the entire kingdom, especially when people half the time don't know what they are doing, and the other time, people know what they are doing that it would be better for them not to know. also, with few making the decisions, decisions can be made quick and easy without all that unnecessary political garbage that creates very significant delays. and when there are a few making decisions, there are only a few agendas. but with democracy, everyone is in charge, and there are a million different agendas at least.
Permalink Reply by J. Jury (אליהוא) on May 4, 2010 at 12:43am if its true what you say about the judges and 2nd Clement and Polycarp, I'll be forced to change my opinion on democracy, however, I still prefer Monarchy =). What I'd really like to see is a King with Judges and Priesthood. The Priesthood must have the highest authority always, then the King has the second highest authority, and finally the Judges have the least authority. This I suppose would be similar to American system, however, the King is not elected and it would seem also that the priest is not elected. But, the Judges would be elected (and in all honesty, I would be fine with the proposed system, where the people elect judges but not the king nor the priesthood). So, instead of democracy where essentially the people have all the power, I would propose partial democracy, where people have some power.
But yes, I believe the authority of power should be as follows: 1.Priests 2.Kings 3.Judges
In America, it is more like this: 1.Judges (includes both actually judges and legislative branch) 2.King (President) 3.Priests (Religion)
Permalink Reply by Smart on May 4, 2010 at 12:43am well, maybe Puerto Rico will become the 51st state, and california will secede, maintaining the desired 50. i can't imagine california seceding. besides, I am compelled in the deepest parts of my very being to return to the homeland.
Permalink Reply by 命 on May 5, 2010 at 6:09am lol, i suppose i was wrong about the order. actually, it seems the only flaw with the American system would be that Judges, Kings, and Priests are elected, whereas, it seems that Scripturally, they are not supposed to be elected unless it is necessary to elect them. when there are judges, a king, or priests, they are to choose their successors, not the common people.
I found the following that is claimed by sites I read: "While judge is the closest literal translation of the Hebrew term used in the masoretic text, the position is more one of unelected non-hereditary leadership[2] than that of legal pronouncement." "The Sanhedrin as a body claimed powers that lesser Jewish courts did not have. As such, they were the only ones who could try the king, extend the boundaries of the Temple and Jerusalem, and were the ones to whom all questions of law were finally put." So, you are right, it would seem the King had more power than the priesthood, but the Judges has more power than the king, or at least, that was how it was supposed to be.
© 2013 Created by James Trimm.