1 Now I make known to you, my brothers, the Good News that I proclaimed to you, and [that] you received, and in which you stand, In his Jewish New Testament Commentary, David Stern writes of 1Cor. 15:7:<\/p>\n\n\n\n The appearance to Ya\u2019akov (James), \u2026is not mentioned elsewhere in the New Testament but is reported in one of the apocryphal books, the Gospel according to the Hebrews\u2026 What is the Gospel according to the Hebrews? The Gospel according to the Hebrews was an ancient, lost, apocryphal gospel which was used by the ancient Nazarenes, the original followers of Yeshua as Messiah.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Third Century \u201cChurch Father\u201d Eusebius wrote of this document:<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cAnd among them [doubted books] some have placed the Gospel according to the Hebrews which is the especial delight of those of the Hebrews who have accepted Messiah.\u201d When speaking of the Ebionites, Epiphanius calls GH \u201ctheir Gospel\u201d (Pan. 30:16:4-5) and Jerome refers to GH as \u201cthe Gospel which the Nazarenes and Ebionites use\u201d (On Mat. 12:13). The actual document has been lost to history, but about 50 quotations and citations of this document are preserved in quotations and citations from the so-called \u201cChurch Fathers\u201d and other commentators even into the middle ages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The twentieth Century Scholar Hugh Schonfield wrote of this lost gospel:<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cThe Gospel according to the Hebrews is a literary outlaw with a price on its head; but in spite of the scholarly hue and cry it still evades capture. Neither monastic libraries nor Egyptian rubbish heaps have so far yielded up a single leaf of this important document\u2026. The Fourth Century \u201cChurch Father\u201d Jerome cites an account of Yeshua\u2019s \u201cLast Supper\u201d Passover Seder in the Gospel according to the Hebrews as follows:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Also the gospel called according to the Hebrews, recently translated by me into Greek and Latin, which Origen often uses, says after the resurrection of the Savior: Now the Lord, when he had given the cloth to the servant of the priest, went to Ya\u2019akov and appeared to him. (for James had sworn that he would not eat bread from that hour in which he had drank the Lord\u2019s cup until he should see him risen from among them that sleep). A little further on the Lord says, Bring a table and bread. And immediately it is added, He took bread and blessed and broke and gave it to Ya\u2019akov HaTzadik and said to him, My brother, eat your bread, for the Son of Man is risen from among them that sleep.\u201d Here we have preserved for us this ancient Nazarene account of Yeshua\u2019s appearance to Ya\u2019akov which Paul had referenced in 1Cor. 15:7, so that we as Nazarenes of the restoration may at Passover reflect upon this new light which we have upon Yeshua\u2019s Seder and his resurrection.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 15:29<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n And if not, what will those who are immersed do for the dead, if the dead do not rise? Why are they immersed for the dead? In his Jewish New Testament Commentary<\/em><\/strong>, David Stern says of this verse only:<\/p>\n\n\n\n A controversial verse with uncertain significance.; this is the only reference in the New Testament to such a practice.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n In the past I have taught that Paul is here referring to the Jewish practice called TAHARAH, the ceremonial washing of a dead body before burial. In this \u201cbaptism for the dead\u201d the deceased is placed on a special board called a \u201ctaharah-board\u201d washed and then \u201cbaptized\u201d either by immersion in a mikveh or by pouring a continuous stream of nine kavim (usually three buckets).<\/p>\n\n\n\n However, as I have studied it deeper. in the Aramaic, this passage cannot be referring to the TAHARAH ritual. The key word here in the Aramaic is \u201cfor\u201d in the phrase \u201cfor the dead\u201d. This word in the Aramaic is KH\u2019LAF (\u05d7\u05dc\u05e3) which literally means \u201con behalf of\u201d or \u201cinstead of\u201d. It cannot refer to the TAHARAH because in this ritual, the dead body itself is immersed, and in the ritual described by Paul in the Aramaic, someone else is being immersed on behalf of, or instead of, the dead person.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This brings us to a statement the fourth Century \u201cChurch Father\u201d Epiphanius makes about the Cerenthians. The Cerentians were a very early Jewish-Gnostic offshoot from the Nazarenes and Ebionites. In his section on the Cerenthians, Epiphanius writes:<\/p>\n\n\n\n From Asia and Gaul has reached us the account [tradition] of a certain practice, namely that when any die without baptism among them, they baptize others in their place and in their name,<\/strong> so that, rising in the resurrection, they will not have to pay the penalty of having failed to receive baptism, but rather will become subject to the authority of the Creator of the World. For this reason this tradition which has reached us is said to be the very thing to which the Apostle himself refers when he says, \u201cIf the dead rise not at all, what shall they do who are baptized for the dead?\u201d<\/strong> This is especially interesting because In the very next section of Panarion, Epiphanius begins to discuss the Nazarenes (the original Jewish followers of Yeshua) with this opening statement:<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cAfter these come Nazoraeans, who originated at the same time or even before, or in conjunction with them or after them. In any case they were their contemporaries. I cannot say more precisely who succeeded whom. For, as I said, these were contemporary with each other, and had similar notions.\u201d<\/strong> This proxy ritual ob behalf of the dead brings to mind actions Judas Maccabee took on behalf of his men who had been killed in battle:<\/p>\n\n\n\n 43 And when he had made a gathering throughout the company to the sum of two thousand drachms of silver, he sent it to Jerusalem to offer a sin offering, doing therein very well and honestly, in that he was mindful of the resurrection: I find this passage about actions Judas Maccabee took on behalf of his men who had been killed in battle:<\/p>\n\n\n\n 43 And when he had made a gathering throughout the company to the sum of two thousand drachms of silver, he sent it to Jerusalem to offer a sin offering, doing therein very well and honestly, in that he was mindful of the resurrection: This brings us to a controversial statement by Pual:<\/p>\n\n\n\n And if not, what will those who are immersed do for the dead, In his Jewish New Testament Commentary<\/em><\/strong>, David Stern says of this verse only:<\/p>\n\n\n\n A controversial verse with uncertain significance.; this is the only reference in the New Testament to such a practice.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n In the past I have taught that Paul is here referring to the Jewish practice called TAHARAH, the ceremonial washing of a dead body before burial. In this \u201cbaptism for the dead\u201d the deceased is placed on a special board called a \u201ctaharah-board\u201d washed and then \u201cbaptized\u201d either by immersion in a mikveh or by pouring a continuous stream of nine kavim (usually three buckets).<\/p>\n\n\n\n However, as I have studied it deeper. in the Aramaic, this passage cannot be referring to the TAHARAH ritual. The key word here in the Aramaic is \u201cfor\u201d in the phrase \u201cfor the dead\u201d. This word in the Aramaic is KH\u2019LAF (\u05d7\u05dc\u05e3) which literally means \u201con behalf of\u201d or \u201cinstead of\u201d. It cannot refer to the TAHARAH because in this ritual, the dead body itself is immersed, and in the ritual described by Paul in the Aramaic, someone else is being immersed on behalf of, or instead of, the dead person.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This brings us to a statement the fourth Century \u201cChurch Father\u201d Epiphanius makes about the Cerenthians. The Cerentians were a very early Jewish-Gnostic offshoot from the Nazarenes and Ebionites. In his section on the Cerenthians, Epiphanius writes:<\/p>\n\n\n\n From Asia and Gaul has reached us the account [tradition] of a certain practice, namely that when any die without baptism among them, they baptize others in their place and in their name,<\/strong> so that, rising in the resurrection, they will not have to pay the penalty of having failed to receive baptism, but rather will become subject to the authority of the Creator of the World. For this reason this tradition which has reached us is said to be the very thing to which the Apostle himself refers when he says, \u201cIf the dead rise not at all, what shall they do who are baptized for the dead?\u201d<\/strong> This is especially interesting because In the very next section of Panarion, Epiphanius begins to discuss the Nazarenes (the original Jewish followers of Yeshua) with this opening statement:<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cAfter these come Nazoraeans, who originated at the same time or even before, or in conjunction with them or after them. In any case they were their contemporaries. I cannot say more precisely who succeeded whom. For, as I said, these were contemporary with each other, and had similar notions.\u201d<\/strong> So the evidence is now very hard to deny:<\/p>\n\n\n\n It seems undeniable that the dead must be able to receive some benefit from prayers, sacrificial offerings and even ritual immersions made on their behalf!<\/p>\n\n\n\n One of the purposes of immersion (\u201cbaptism) from a Jewish perspective is that of becoming a proselyte Jew (this is not the same thing as \u201csalvation\u201d. We know from Exodus 12:43-49 that all members of the Assembly of Israel are required to eat the Passover lamb, but that no uncircumcised males may eat it. And we know from Acts 15 that some uncircumcised males are saved. Therefore, as a function of logic, being saved cannot be the same thing as becoming part of the Assembly of Israel.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A person wanting to become part of the Assembly of Israel must first learn the Torah, thus they are in the synagogues studying Moses each Sabbath, and keeping certain minimum standards while they learn (this is what Acts 15 is about). The process for conversion to Orthodox Judaism today is as follows:<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cThe convert undergoes a period of instruction\u2026. Orthodoxy demands circumcision for males\u2026 The postulant is then given time to recover. Both males and females have to undergo submersion in a Mikvah\u2026 \u201d (The Complete Book of Jewish Observance; Leo Trepp; p. 252)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n There is a discussion in the Talmud about at what point in time a proselyte is considered a Jew. The conclusion was that it was at the time of the ritual immersion, not at the time of the circumcision. because if it was at circumcision, we would have no rule for women. As we read in the Talmud:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Our Rabbis taught: \u2018If a proselyte was circumcised but had not performed the prescribed ritual ablution, R. Eliezer said, \u2018Behold he is a proper proselyte; for so we find that our forefathers were circumcised and had not performed ritual ablution\u2019. If he performed the prescribed ablution but had not been circumcised, R. Joshua said, \u2018Behold he is a proper proselyte; for so we find that the mothers had performed ritual ablution but had not been circumcised\u2019. The Sages, however, said, \u2018Whether he had performed ritual ablution but had not been circumcised or whether he had been circumcised but had not performed the prescribed ritual ablution, he is not a proper proselyte, unless he has been circumcised and has also performed the prescribed ritual ablution.<\/strong> So a male would get circumcised and then wait for their circumcision to heal before undergoing ritual immersion. It was not until after that point, that they were regarded as part of the Assembly of Israel.<\/p>\n\n\n\n It stands to reason that a person could die before their circumcision was healed (perhaps even from a wound infection). It appears that the ancient Nazarene halacha allowed another person to undergo the ritual immersion on their behalf so that person would be resurrected as part of the Assembly of Israel, not simply as a saved gentile.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
2 And by which, you have Life. By the Way of the Word I proclaimed to you; remember, unless you have believed in vain.
3 For I committed to you from the first, according to what I received: that the Messiah died for our sins, as it is written,
4 And that He was buried and rose after three days, as it is written.
5 And He appeared to Kefa: and after him, to the twelve,
6 And after that, He appeared to more than five hundred brothers together; many of whom remain until now, though some of them sleep
7 And after these, He appeared to Ya’akov, and after him to all the emissaries.
(1Cor. 15:1-7 HRV)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
(Jewish New Testament Commentary by David Stern 1Cor. 15:7)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n
(Eusebius; Eccl. Hist. 3:25:5)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n
For behind Hebrews lies the unknown potentialities of the Nazarene tradition, which may confirm or contradict some of the most cherished beliefs of Orthodox Christianity. It is useless for certain theologians to designate Hebrews as \u201csecondary\u201d on the evidence of the present fragmentary remains preserved in quotation. \u2026
Judged by ancient testimony alone it is indisputable that Hebrews has the best right of any Gospel to be considered a genuine apostolic production;\u2026
Here is obviously a most valuable witness, perhaps the most valuable witness to the truth about [Yeshua]\u2026 whom even a jury composed entirely of orthodox Christians could not despise, and who ought to be brought into court. But the witness is missing, and all that we have is a few reported statements of his taken long ago\u2026
\u2026it may be argued that there has been dependence not of \u2018Hebrews\u2019 on the Synoptics but vice versa\u2013 that \u2018Hebrews\u2019 was one of the sources on which one or more of them drew.\u201d
(Hugh Schonfield; According to the Hebrews; 13-18)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n
(Jerome; On Illustrious Men, 2)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n
(1Cor. 15:29 HRV)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
(Panarion 1.28.6).<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n
(Panarion 1:29:1)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n
44 For if he had not hoped that they that were slain should have risen again, it had been superfluous and vain to pray for the dead.
45 And also in that he perceived that there was great favour laid up for those that died godly, it was an holy and good thought. Whereupon he made a reconciliation for the dead, that they might be delivered from sin.
(2Maccabees 12:43-45 KJV)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n![\"\"](\"http:\/\/nazarenespace.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/mikvah.jpg\")
<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n
44 For if he had not hoped that they that were slain should have risen again, it had been superfluous and vain to pray for the dead.
45 And also in that he perceived that there was great favour laid up for those that died godly, it was an holy and good thought. Whereupon he made a reconciliation for the dead, that they might be delivered from sin.
(2Maccabees 12:43-45 KJV)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n
if the dead do not rise? Why are they immersed for the dead?
(1Cor. 15:29 HRV)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n
(Panarion 1.28.6).<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n
(Panarion 1:29:1)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n
(b.Yeb. 46a)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n